ŠNW NW DHDH/Shenu Nu Dekyahdekyah:
[Cycle of Revolution]
The Moral Response of
an Oppressed People!
Ambakisye-Okang Olatunde Dukuzumurenyi, Ph.D.
[Public Policy Analysis]
ŠNW NW DHDH/ Shenu Nu
Dekyahdekyah:
The Expected Response to Arbitrary Government
“People involved in a revolution don't become part
of the system; they destroy the system.” [Mhenga Malcolm X]
“The education of a people must depend upon the
problems those people have to solve. Therefore, I often say the destiny of the
Black child is revolutionary while the destiny of the white child is
conservative. The major thing that the white child must do is maintain the
advantages and privileges that whites already have and ideally add to those
advantages. When we refer to Black people and the Black child as being
disadvantaged we are referring to the fact that we do not have our share of
what this world has to offer. And when we recognize that we will have to take
that share from other people and that we will have to be able to protect that
share once we take it from other people. We must realize that the destiny of
our children is revolutionary. And then we are in a sense preparing our
children for warfare. That
means that the children must be reared and educated to take on those tasks.
Therefore that means they cannot be reared and educated in the same ways of
white children. We must design their education in terms of their destiny.”
[Mhenga Amos N. Wilson]
The
Latin term revolution is defined in the Eurasian tradition as “…a forcible
overthrow of an established government or political system by the people
governed; a complete, pervasive, usually radical change in something, often
made relatively quickly; a cycle.”[1]
In
the classical Global Afrikan tradition of
Utamaduni Mkubwa ya , NHSW KMT/Nehesu-Kemet [Kush/Kemet: Negro-Egyptian,
Kushite-KMT/Kemet] revolution is
described by two terms, , DHDH/Dekyahdekyah and , ŠNW/Shenu. , DHDH/Dekyahdekyah is
defined as a socio-political economic revolution, a social upheaval or
political convulsions, times of instability disruptions in the functioning of
the social system due to violent tumult occurring between social institutions.
The noun , DHDH/Dekyahdekyah is
derived from the verb , DH/Dekyah, which means to
depose, displace or supplant. , ŠNW/Shenu
carries the idea of a cycle, circuit or circle.
Here the two are combined to render
,
ŠNW NW DHDH/Shenu
Nu Dekyahdekyah [Kush/Kemet:
Cycle of Revolution] suggesting in the socio-political economic
sense that societies move through three general stages of , KMЗ/Kema [Kush/Kemet:
Creation, Establishment, Production], , SRWD/Serudj
[Kush/Kemet: Fortification, Perpetuation,
Flourishment, Restoration], , SWXЗY/Sukhay [Kush/Kemet: Deterioration, Disintegration,
Decay].[2]
As indicated by both the traditions of Eurasia and Afrika
, ŠNW
NW DHDH/Shenu Nu Dekyahdekyah [Kush/Kemet:
Cycle of Revolution] is the overthrow of an established
socio-political economic system by those who find themselves under the
arbitrary tyrannical control of the system.
History is littered with many examples where government that is unjust
and oppressive has caused the
,
ŠNW NW DHDH/Shenu
Nu Dekyahdekyah [Kush/Kemet:
Cycle of Revolution].
Five
examples will be considered here and they are the War of National Liberation in
,
NHSW KMT/Nehesu-Kemet [Kush/Kemet:
Negro-Egyptian, Kushite-KMT/Kemet] c. 2681 KC [c. 1560 BCE],
which will be covered in detail, and the Judean War of National Liberation c. 4311
KC [c. 70 CE], the American Revolution c. 6016- 6024 KC [c. 1775-1783
CE], the French Revolution c. 6030 KC [c. 1789 CE] and the Serbian Independence
Movement c. 6155 KC [c. 1914 CE] will be given cursory attention.
[1]
Jess Stein (Ed.), The Random House College Dictionary Revised Edition
(New York: Random House, Inc., 1988) pp. 1131.
[2] Ambakisye-Okang Dukuzumurenyi, “Socio-Political
Economic Re-construction, Nation-Building, and the Parameters of Authentic
Wafrika Weusi Global SBЗ/Seba: Re-creating an Wafrika Weusi Grassroots Oriented
Pan-Afrikan SBЗ/Seba Policy Agenda for the Re-establishment of Wafrika Weusi
Global Power in the 62nd Century KC [21st Century BCE],” The
Global Afrikan Journal of Research (2014) Vol. 1(1), pp. 1-76; Robert A.
Isaak and Ralph P. Hummel, Politics for Human Beings (North Scituate,
Massachusetts: Duxbury Press, 1975) pp. 3-9.
No comments:
Post a Comment